Like most things in this course, I hadn't heard of agenda
setting before I stepped in to the lecture theatre on one faithful Monday afternoon.
It was simply another aspect of journalism that I never thought about. To
everyone out there like myself who doesn't know what agenda setting is, let me
enlighten you. Agenda setting is when the media presents issues frequently to
the audience that results in large numbers of the public perceiving those
issues are more important that other ones. Within this, there are two
assumptions of media agenda. Firstly, mass media don’t reflect and respect,
they filter and shape it. Secondly, media concentrates on few issues and this
leads to the public perceiving those issues as more important that the other
issues.
Throughout the lecture I began to form a problem with agenda
setting. I thought about the story that I had chosen to do for my annotated
bibliography, a suicide from a nineteen year old girl who was a victim of
bullying. Her story was publicised all over the news for weeks when it had
happened, however there are many similar cases that don’t even get a mention in
the newspapers. Does media agenda decide that person is not important? Or why
is one case of this happening more important than the other? The news chooses
an agenda when it hasn’t been publicised for a while. That way it is fresh, new
and interesting to the reader, attracting their attention. However as soon as a
similar event takes place, the news is not so quick to publish it because the
audience may see it as ‘another suicide story’.
No comments:
Post a Comment